Stephens v. Hill

Full title: JAMES LEE STEPHENS, Petitioner, v. JEAN HILL, Superintendent, Respondents

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 17, 2006

1:05-CV-00058 OWW SMS HC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2006)

Opinion

1:05-CV-00058 OWW SMS HC.

August 17, 2006

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ENTER JUDGMENT Order Adopting Findings and Recommendation [Doc. #34].

OLIVER WANGER, District Judge

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On June 19, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that recommended the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED for Petitioner's failure to comply with a court order. This Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections to the Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. Over thirty (30) days have passed and no party has filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued June 19, 2006, is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.