From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stephens v. Crouch

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 26, 1985
479 So. 2d 879 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 84-2265.

December 26, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County; H. Mark Purdy, Judge.

Jay A. Schwartz of Grief Schwartz, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

David F. Holmes of Braverman Holmes, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


Appellant, Robert L. Stephens, appeals from an adverse summary judgment entered in favor of the appellee, Ann Crouch. Ann Crouch filed an action against the appellant on a promissory note. The issue in this case is whether there existed a genuine issue of material fact precluding the entry of summary judgment as a matter of law. The record on appeal discloses that there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the debt has been satisfied. The appellant, the maker of the promissory note, should be allowed to prove that fact at a proper hearing on the merits. Cf. Wagner v. Bonucelli, 239 So.2d 619 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970) (summary judgment in favor of payee was improper because the court may consider extrinsic evidence in support of the defenses of lack of consideration, release, waiver, or estoppel); Bassato v. Denicola, 80 So.2d 353 (Fla. 1955).

It is a well settled rule that a summary judgment should only be granted in the complete absence of a genuine issue of material fact. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla. 1966). Accordingly, the judgment appealed is reversed.

REVERSED.

DELL and WALDEN, JJ., and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., Associate Judge (Retired), concur.


Summaries of

Stephens v. Crouch

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 26, 1985
479 So. 2d 879 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Stephens v. Crouch

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT L. STEPHENS, APPELLANT, v. ANN CROUCH, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 26, 1985

Citations

479 So. 2d 879 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)