Opinion
December 28, 1987
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Finnegan in the Supreme Court.
We add that the Court of Appeals has recently held that even if an alleged error of constitutional dimension may be involved, prohibition does not lie because the issue would be reviewable upon direct appeal (Matter of Lipari v Owens, 70 N.Y.2d 731). Bracken, J.P., Kunzeman, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.