From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stephen v. Zhang

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 15, 2010
No. CIV S-09-1516 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1516 MCE KJM P.

July 15, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 45) is denied.


Summaries of

Stephen v. Zhang

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 15, 2010
No. CIV S-09-1516 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2010)
Case details for

Stephen v. Zhang

Case Details

Full title:JIMMIE STEPHEN, Plaintiff, v. DR. F. ZHANG, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 15, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1516 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2010)