From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stephen v. Tileston

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 16, 2021
2:20-cv-1841 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-1841 KJM KJN P

08-16-2021

JIMMIE STEPHEN, Plaintiff, v. C. TILESTONE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 5, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Obj., ECF No. 15. Plaintiff also moves for leave to amend the complaint. Mot., ECF No. 16.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 5, 2021, are adopted in full;
2. This action is dismissed;
3. The clerk of court is directed to close this case; and
4. The motion to amend is denied as moot.


Summaries of

Stephen v. Tileston

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 16, 2021
2:20-cv-1841 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Stephen v. Tileston

Case Details

Full title:JIMMIE STEPHEN, Plaintiff, v. C. TILESTONE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 16, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-1841 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2021)