From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stephen v. Sacramento Police Department

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 12, 2011
No. CIV S-11-2151 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-2151 CKD P.

October 12, 2011


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed August 17, 2011, plaintiff was ordered to file a request to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any reply to the objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order.Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Stephen v. Sacramento Police Department

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 12, 2011
No. CIV S-11-2151 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Stephen v. Sacramento Police Department

Case Details

Full title:KIRK ELLZEY STEPHEN, Plaintiff, v. SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 12, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-2151 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2011)