From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stephan v. Cooley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Sep 24, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-CV-02458 (W.D. La. Sep. 24, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-CV-02458

09-24-2016

PAUL B. STEPHAN D.O.P. #316085 v. KEITH COOLEY


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation (Rec. Doc. 18) of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, after an independent review of the record, a de novo determination of the issues, consideration of Petitioner's Objections (Rec. Doc. 23), consideration of respondent's response (Rec. Doc. 24) and having determined that the findings are correct under applicable law,

IT IS ORDERED that the petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus (Rec. Doc. 1) be and hereby is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Lake Charles, Louisiana, this 24 day of September, 2016.

/s/_________

PATRICIA MINALDI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Stephan v. Cooley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Sep 24, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-CV-02458 (W.D. La. Sep. 24, 2016)
Case details for

Stephan v. Cooley

Case Details

Full title:PAUL B. STEPHAN D.O.P. #316085 v. KEITH COOLEY

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

Date published: Sep 24, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-CV-02458 (W.D. La. Sep. 24, 2016)