From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stengel v. Savetsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 14, 1997
238 A.D.2d 405 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

April 14, 1997


In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., based on lack of informed consent, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated September 9, 1996, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In light of the defendant's alleged statement to the infant plaintiff's mother wherein he conceded his error, a statement which he does not specifically deny making, the Supreme Court properly denied his motion for summary judgment. Mangano, P.J., Ritter, Sullivan, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stengel v. Savetsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 14, 1997
238 A.D.2d 405 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Stengel v. Savetsky

Case Details

Full title:NAFTALI STENGEL et al., Respondents, v. LAWRENCE SAVETSKY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 14, 1997

Citations

238 A.D.2d 405 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
657 N.Y.S.2d 339