Opinion
No. 10–17755.
2012-07-25
Richard STENGEL; Mary Lou Stengel, Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. MEDTRONIC INCORPORATED, a foreign corporation, Defendant–Appellee.
Thomas G. Cotter, Haralson Miller Pitt Feldman & McAnally, PLC, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiffs–Appellants. Michael Kevin Brown and Lisa Marie Baird, Reed Smith, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, and Timothy James Casey, Esquire, Litigation Counsel, Schmitt, Schneck, Smyth & Herrod PC, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant–Appellee.
Thomas G. Cotter, Haralson Miller Pitt Feldman & McAnally, PLC, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiffs–Appellants. Michael Kevin Brown and Lisa Marie Baird, Reed Smith, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, and Timothy James Casey, Esquire, Litigation Counsel, Schmitt, Schneck, Smyth & Herrod PC, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant–Appellee.
D.C. No. 4:10–cv–00318–RCC.
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judges Wardlaw, Murguia and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote as to whether the case should be taken en banc.