From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steinman v. Royal Charter Props., Inc.

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 5, 2006
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 51893 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)

Opinion

570226/06.

Decided October 5, 2006.

Defendant Rapid Park Industries, Inc. appeals from a judgment of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court, New York County (Eileen Koretz, J.), entered August 9, 2004, after trial, in favor of plaintiff and awarding him damages in the principal amount of $3,600.

Judgment (Eileen Koretz, J.), entered August 9, 2004, affirmed, without costs.

PRESENT: McKEON, P.J., McCOOE, DAVIS, JJ


The court's determination that the defendant parking garage owner was negligent is supported by the record evidence, which includes defendant's own written acknowledgment that "it was the parking garage security that failed." Thus, the judgment in plaintiff's favor achieved "substantial justice" consistent with substantive law principles (CCA 1804, 1807).

This constitutes the decision and order of the court.

I concur.


Summaries of

Steinman v. Royal Charter Props., Inc.

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 5, 2006
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 51893 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)
Case details for

Steinman v. Royal Charter Props., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID STEINMAN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROYAL CHARTER PROPERTIES, INC.…

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 5, 2006

Citations

2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 51893 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)