Steinman v. Kerestes

Full title: SETH STEINMAN v. JOHN KERESTES, et al

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 31, 2011

CIVIL ACTION No. 10-2398 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 10-2398.

August 31, 2011

ORDER

JUAN SANCHEZ, Judge

AND NOW, this 31st day of August, 2011, upon careful and independent consideration of Petitioner Seth Steinman's pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge, to which no objections have been filed, ¹ it is ORDERED:

1 The Report and Recommendation was sent to all parties of record on August 1, 2011. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.1 IV(b), a party may object to a magistrate judge's report "within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy thereof." As of today's date, no objections have been filed.

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED without an evidentiary hearing;

3. Petitioner's Motions for Leave to Amend or Supplement Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document 28) and for Stay of the Proceedings (Document 29) are DENIED;

3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability; and,

4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED.