From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steinhauser v. Socony Mobil Oil Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 9, 1973
42 A.D.2d 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Opinion

July 9, 1973


In consolidated negligence actions (tried solely on plaintiff James F. Steinhauser's cause of action to recover damages for personal injuries), both plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered January 14, 1972, in favor of defendants against plaintiff Steinhauser, upon the trial court's dismissal of said plaintiff's complaint at the close of the evidence at a jury trial. Appeal by plaintiff Wallach's Auto Rental, Inc., dismissed, without costs. The judgment does not contain a decretal provision adverse to said plaintiff. On the appeal by plaintiff Steinhauser, judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted between said plaintiff and defendants, with costs to abide the event. The appeal did not present questions of fact. In our opinion, the fact that plaintiff Steinhauser was an amnesiac was sufficient to require the presentment of his case to the jury ( Schechter v. Klanfer, 28 N.Y.2d 228; Noseworthy v. City of New York, 298 N.Y. 76). Rabin, P.J., Hopkins, Munder, Martuscello and Shapiro, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Steinhauser v. Socony Mobil Oil Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 9, 1973
42 A.D.2d 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)
Case details for

Steinhauser v. Socony Mobil Oil Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES F. STEINHAUSER et al., Appellants, v. SOCONY MOBIL OIL COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 9, 1973

Citations

42 A.D.2d 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)