From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steinhauer v. McDaniel

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Feb 9, 2010
3:08-cv-00619-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Feb. 9, 2010)

Opinion

3:08-cv-00619-LRH-VPC.

February 9, 2010


ORDER


This is a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On November 30, 2009, respondents filed a motion for an extension of time to file their reply to petitioner's opposition to respondents' motion to dismiss. (Docket #47.) Good cause appearing, respondents' motion for an extension of time is HEREBY GRANTED nunc pro tunc. Respondents are GRANTED to and including February 8, 2010, in which to file and serve their reply.


Summaries of

Steinhauer v. McDaniel

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Feb 9, 2010
3:08-cv-00619-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Feb. 9, 2010)
Case details for

Steinhauer v. McDaniel

Case Details

Full title:DAVID MICHAEL STEINHAUER, Petitioner, v. E.K. McDANIEL, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Feb 9, 2010

Citations

3:08-cv-00619-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Feb. 9, 2010)