From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steiner v. McKee

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 13, 1988
517 So. 2d 795 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

Nos. 4-86-1370, 4-86-1406.

January 13, 1988.

Consolidated appeals and cross appeals from the Circuit Court for Broward County, James M. Reasbeck, Judge.

Jerome L. Tepps of Tepps Glerum, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants/cross appellees Steiner.

Andrew L. Siegel of Andrew L. Siegel, P.A., Plantation, for appellee/cross appellant Hazel McKee.


We affirm because we do not believe it has been demonstrated on appeal that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to admit into evidence a document which was relevant to the issues being tried but which was not disclosed in advance of trial, either during discovery or in accord with the pretrial procedures of the court requiring the disclosure of evidence in advance of trial.

ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Steiner v. McKee

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 13, 1988
517 So. 2d 795 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Steiner v. McKee

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW STEINER AND MILDRED STEINER, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS/CROSS APPELLEES…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 13, 1988

Citations

517 So. 2d 795 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)