Opinion
February 14, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Balletta, J.).
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with one bill of costs.
A review of the record reveals that the plaintiff's motion, although denominated one for resettlement, renewal and reargument, was actually a motion for reargument only. Accordingly, the instant appeal must be dismissed, as no appeal lies from the denial of reargument (Zeldin v Village of E. Hampton, 141 A.D.2d 631). Mollen, P.J., Mangano, Brown and Sullivan, JJ., concur.