From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steinau v. Metropolitan Street R. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 1, 1901
63 App. Div. 126 (N.Y. App. Div. 1901)

Opinion

July Term, 1901.

B. Gerson Oppenheim, for the appellant.

John T. Little, for the respondent.


This action was brought to recover for personal injuries, the complaint alleging that the plaintiff was injured by one of the cars of the defendant, the defendant's agent not giving her sufficient time to board the car; that the plaintiff was thrown to the street and seriously injured, and was obliged to and did incur great expense for medical and surgical attendance, appliances and medicines. The order required the plaintiff to give a bill of particulars specifying the number of the defendant's car and the direction in which it was and had been moving, and the name and numbers of the conductor and gripman in charge thereof.

We do not think the court below was justified in compelling the plaintiff to give the particulars above specified, as the plaintiff never got upon the car. It cannot be assumed that she knew the number of the car or the names or numbers of the conductor and gripman, and she expressly denies such knowledge. She was also required to specify in what respect she was seriously injured. We do not think the plaintiff should be compelled to specify by a bill of particulars the injury complained of, its nature, location and extent. We think the court below correctly ordered an itemized statement of the expenses that the plaintiff was put to for medical and surgical appliances; but we think the particulars should be confined to such a statement, and that the plaintiff should not be compelled to furnish the defendant with the names and addresses of the physicians, the number of visits and the other particulars specified in the 4th subdivision of the defendant's demand. As to the 5th subdivision, we think the court correctly required the plaintiff to state the number of weeks that she was confined to her bed as alleged in the 4th paragraph of the complaint.

The order should be modified by requiring the plaintiff to give the particulars of the expenses to which she was put for medical and surgical attendance, appliances and medicines, and the number of weeks during which she was confined to her bed as alleged in the 4th subdivision of the complaint; and as modified affirmed, without costs.

VAN BRUNT, P.J., PATTERSON, O'BRIEN and McLAUGHLIN, JJ., concurred.

Order modified as directed in opinion, and affirmed as modified, without costs.


Summaries of

Steinau v. Metropolitan Street R. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 1, 1901
63 App. Div. 126 (N.Y. App. Div. 1901)
Case details for

Steinau v. Metropolitan Street R. Co.

Case Details

Full title:ANNA STEINAU, Appellant, v . METROPOLITAN STREET RAILWAY COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1901

Citations

63 App. Div. 126 (N.Y. App. Div. 1901)
71 N.Y.S. 256

Citing Cases

Ziadi v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

The action is for personal injuries alleged to have been received by the plaintiff by reason of the…

Taylor v. Security Mutual Life Ins. Co.

There is no propriety in extending to cases of this character the rule that in actions for personal injuries…