Opinion
3593N, 3594N.
Decided May 11, 2004.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Visitacion-Lewis, J.), entered January 17, 2003, which granted plaintiff pendente relief in a matrimonial action, and order, same court and Justice, entered October 3, 2003, which denied defendant's motion for a downward modification, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Law Offices of Pasquale J. Crispo, New York (Pasquale J. Crispo of counsel), for appellant.
Kasowitz, Benson, Torres Friedman LLP, New York (Eleanor B. Alter of counsel), for respondent).
Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Sullivan, Marlow, JJ.
Defendant fails to show either exigent circumstances or a failure by the motion court to properly consider the factors specified in Domestic Relations Law § 236(B)(6), § 237(a) and § 240(1-b) (c), (f). His remedy for any perceived inequities in the award is a prompt trial ( see Anonymous v. Anonymous, 241 A.D.2d 353).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.