From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stein v. Director of Corrections

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 11, 2008
No. CIV S-05-1592 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-1592 GEB KJM P.

January 11, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's January 2, 2008 motion for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings.


Summaries of

Stein v. Director of Corrections

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 11, 2008
No. CIV S-05-1592 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2008)
Case details for

Stein v. Director of Corrections

Case Details

Full title:MOSHE ISAAC STEIN, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR OF CORRECTIONS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 11, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-05-1592 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2008)