From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stein v. Brooklyn Ash Can Manufacturing Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1910
137 App. Div. 896 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)

Opinion

March, 1910.


Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and the complaint dismissed, with costs, upon the ground that the evidence conclusively establishes that the contract was with Solomon Redlich personally, and not with the defendant. (See Spencer v. Huntington, 100 App. Div. 463; affd. on opinion below, 183 N.Y. 506. ) Jenks, Burr, Thomas, Rich and Carr, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Stein v. Brooklyn Ash Can Manufacturing Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1910
137 App. Div. 896 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Case details for

Stein v. Brooklyn Ash Can Manufacturing Company

Case Details

Full title:Samuel Stein, Respondent, v. Brooklyn Ash Can Manufacturing Company…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1910

Citations

137 App. Div. 896 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
121 N.Y.S. 1148