Stein v. 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc.

3 Citing cases

  1. New Falls Corp. v. Soni Holdings, LLC

    19-CV-00449 (HG) (LGD) (E.D.N.Y. Jul. 6, 2023)   Cited 1 times

    Plaintiff had ample opportunity to provide such records to the Court, but failed to do so.See Urena v. 0325 Tuta Corp., No. 20-CV-3751, 2022 WL 17249362, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 28, 2022) (declining to award attorneys' fees because the application lacked contemporaneous time records); Stein v. 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc., No. 16-CV-6252, 2019 WL 1099946, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 7, 2019) (“Stein's failure to submit contemporaneous time records is fatal to her motion.”); U.S. Bank Tr., N.A. v. Dingman, No. 16-CV-1384, 2016 WL 6902480, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 22, 2016) (“[T]he lack of contemporaneous time sheets precludes any such award.”)

  2. Treyger v. Liberty 99 Cents Paradise Inc.

    21-CV-5189 (PKC) (RER) (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 18, 2022)   Cited 1 times

    As such, I respectfully recommend that the Court deny Plaintiff's request for attorney's fees at this time. Shariff v. Radamar Meat Corp., No. 11-CV-6369 (NGG) (RML), 2014 WL 1311563, at *5 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 2014), adopted as modified by 2014 WL 1311565 (Mar. 31, 2014) (denying an ADA plaintiff's request for attorney's fees and costs when “plaintiff's counsel has provided no documentation of his fees or costs”); Stein v. 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc., No. 16-CV-6252 (RRM) (SJB), 2019 WL 1099946, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 7, 2019) (plaintiff's “failure to submit contemporaneous time records is fatal to her motion”); Drunken Chicken in NY Corp., 2020 WL 4013187, at *5 (“plaintiff's counsel has failed to provide any documentation of his fees or costs.

  3. Visser v. Vitamin Shoppe, Inc.

    Civ. 19-cv-20545 (WJM) (LDW) (D.N.J. Dec. 17, 2021)

    Party H then conducted due diligence and sought committed financing. On September 23, 2019, in light of Party H's failure to obtain such financing, Vitamin Shoppe ceased negotiations with Party H and disclosed this cessation through a Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 11, 2019) (Magistrate Judge adjudicated motion for attorney's fees premised on common benefit doctrine as non-dispositive matter); Stein v. 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc., 16-cv-6252-RRM-SJB, 2019 WL 1099946 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 7, 2019) (same). Cf. In re: Terrorist Attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, 03-MDL-1570 (GBD) (SN), 2019 WL 4744268, (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2019) (following entry of default judgment, Magistrate Judge created common benefit fund and authorized disbursements to counsel as non-dispositive matter).