From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steimle v. Department of Revenue

Tax Court of Oregon
Oct 25, 2016
TC 5277 (Or. T.C. Oct. 25, 2016)

Opinion

TC 5277

10-25-2016

DANIEL E. STEIMLE, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL

This matter comes before the court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Defendant Department of Revenue (the department) argued that dismissal is warranted because Plaintiff (taxpayer) failed to pay the tax, interest, and penalty on or before filing his complaint in the Regular Division as required by ORS 305.419.

Taxpayer did not contest that he failed to pay the amount due. In addition, taxpayer conceded at the hearing that it would not be an undue hardship to pay the amount due. Rather, taxpayer argued that ORS 305.419 does not apply to this case because the magistrate did not reach the merits of taxpayer's case before dismissing it.

The court concludes that ORS 305.419 does apply to this case. Therefore, taxpayer was required to either allege undue hardship, or pay the tax, interest, and penalty. Counsel for the department is directed to prepare and submit an appropriate form of judgment. Now, therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is granted.


Summaries of

Steimle v. Department of Revenue

Tax Court of Oregon
Oct 25, 2016
TC 5277 (Or. T.C. Oct. 25, 2016)
Case details for

Steimle v. Department of Revenue

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL E. STEIMLE, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon…

Court:Tax Court of Oregon

Date published: Oct 25, 2016

Citations

TC 5277 (Or. T.C. Oct. 25, 2016)