Opinion
81-08623; CA A28143
Argued and submitted December 9, 1983
Reversed and remanded February 15, 1984
Judicial Review from the Workers' Compensation Board.
Christopher D. Moore, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Malagon and Associates, Eugene.
Paul J. DeMuniz, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Garrett, Seideman, Hemann, Robertson De Muniz, P.C., Salem.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Newman, Judges.
PER CURIAM
Reversed and remanded.
Reversed and remanded to the Board to determine under ORS 656.295(5) whether the case should be remanded to the referee, because it has been "improperly, incompletely or otherwise insufficiently developed or heard by the referee." Bailey v. SAIF, 296 Or. 41, 672 P.2d 333 (1983).