Steffensen v. Daniels

Full title: FRANK STEFFENSEN, Petitioner, v. CHARLES DANIELS, Respondent

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Jul 28, 2005

Civil No. 04-1 709-CO Lead Case, Civil No. 04-1787-CO Consolidated (D. Or. Jul. 28, 2005)

Opinion

Civil No. 04-1 709-CO Lead Case, Civil No. 04-1787-CO Consolidated.

July 28, 2005

ORDER

ANN AIKEN, District Judge

Magistrate Judge Cooney filed his Findings and Recommendation on June 30, 2005. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452,454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Cooney's Findings and Recommendation.