From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stefani v. Longhorn

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Aug 21, 2023
2:23-cv-00343-YY (D. Or. Aug. 21, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00343-YY

08-21-2023

THOMAS EUGENE STEFANI, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL ALLEN LONGHORN and EDWARD ALFRED LONGHORN, SR., Defendants.


ORDER

ADRIENNE NELSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You issued her first Findings and Recommendations ("First F & R") in this case on May 1, 2023. Judge You recommended that this Court dismiss this case without prejudice because after an attempt to cure the complaint's deficiencies, plaintiff has failed to establish subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff filed objections. On July 3, 2023, before this Court issued an order on the First F & R, plaintiff filed a Proposed Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. On that same day, Judge You issued a Second F & R recommending that this Court deny plaintiff's motion and dismiss the case with prejudice because plaintiff has failed to establish subject matter jurisdiction and amendment would be futile.

A district court judge may "accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). If any party files objections to a magistrate judge's proposed findings and recommendations, "the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report." Id. If no objections are filed, then no standard of review applies. However, further review by the district court sua sponte is not prohibited. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985). The Advisory Committee notes to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) recommend that unobjected to proposed findings and recommendations be reviewed for "clear error on the face of the record." Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) advisory committee's note to 1983 amendment.

Upon review, I agree with Judge You's recommendation, and I ADOPT the First F&R, ECF [24], and the Second F & R, as my own opinions. Because plaintiff has failed to establish subject matter jurisdiction and amendment would be futile, this case is dismissed with prejudice. All other pending motions are denied as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stefani v. Longhorn

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Aug 21, 2023
2:23-cv-00343-YY (D. Or. Aug. 21, 2023)
Case details for

Stefani v. Longhorn

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS EUGENE STEFANI, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL ALLEN LONGHORN and EDWARD…

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Aug 21, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00343-YY (D. Or. Aug. 21, 2023)

Citing Cases

Augusta v. Paini

at *2 (W.D. Mich. Apr. 13, 2020) (stating Elder Abuse Prevention and Prosecution Act “does not authorize…