Steen v. State

1 Citing case

  1. Duenas v. State

    No. 05-14-00192-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 16, 2015)   Cited 6 times
    Holding that the State properly abandoned language in an indictment for continuous sexual abuse of a child which reduced the charged offense to the lesser included offense of indecency with a child without the necessity of an amendment to the indictment

    Eastep, 941 S.W.2d at 135; Chen, 410 S.W.3d at 396.See also Steen v. State, No. 05-04-01633-CR, 2006 WL 1624432, at *3 (Tex. App.—Dallas June 13, 2006, no pet.) (not designated for publication). See also Barron v. State, No. 03-11-00519-CR, 2013 WL 3929121, at *7 n.3 (Tex. App.—Austin July 26, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (concluding that analysis in Eastep regarding surplusage in indictment "remains good law" because court of criminal appeals continues to refer to analysis in Eastep with approval).