From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steen v. Schuetzle

United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Southwestern Division
Jun 1, 2009
Case No. 1:07-cv-094 (D.N.D. Jun. 1, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 1:07-cv-094.

June 1, 2009


ORDER


The Eighth Circuit granted the Petitioner's appeal, reversing this court's order dismissing the Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as untimely and remanding for further proceedings.

The court, without passing on its merits, therefore ORDERS that the Respondent file an answer with the court within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order. Respondent's answer shall comply with the requirements of Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Court. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve the Respondent with copies of the petition in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration (Docket No. 7) and Motion to Remand (Docket No. 11) are MOOT.


Summaries of

Steen v. Schuetzle

United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Southwestern Division
Jun 1, 2009
Case No. 1:07-cv-094 (D.N.D. Jun. 1, 2009)
Case details for

Steen v. Schuetzle

Case Details

Full title:Randal R. Steen, Petitioner, v. Timothy Schuetzle, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Southwestern Division

Date published: Jun 1, 2009

Citations

Case No. 1:07-cv-094 (D.N.D. Jun. 1, 2009)