From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steele v. Warden

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 15, 2011
No. CIV S-03-0143 GEB CMK (TEMP) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-03-0143 GEB CMK (TEMP).

April 15, 2011


ORDER


Within twenty days of the filed date of this order, petitioner shall file a brief on the impact of Cullen v. Pinholster, No. 09-1088, 2011 WL 1225705 (U.S. Apr. 4, 2011) on these proceedings and, in particular, on the discovery and motion for an evidentiary hearing contemplated in the court's February 7, 2011 order. Within twenty days of the filing of petitioner's brief, respondent shall file an opposition. Within ten days thereafter, petitioner may file a reply.

The February 7 order advised Mr. Giannini to submit a budget for the remainder of phase III of these proceedings. Until the court has resolved the issues raised by Pinholster, Mr. Giannini shall not propose that budget. Mr. Giannini may, however, submit a request to amend the phase III budget to account for his time necessary to respond to this order.

DATED: April 14, 2011


Summaries of

Steele v. Warden

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 15, 2011
No. CIV S-03-0143 GEB CMK (TEMP) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Steele v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND EDWARD STEELE, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, San Quentin State Prison…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 15, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-03-0143 GEB CMK (TEMP) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2011)