Steele v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

2 Citing cases

  1. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. v. Superior Court (City and County of San Francisco)

    13 Cal. Rptr. 737 (Cal. Ct. App. 1961)

    'Said motion will be based upon this notice, the memorandum of Points and Authorities attached, and the records and files of the above-entitled cause.' Petitioner filed a memorandum in opposition, asserting that no sufficient showing of good cause was made, and citing Steele v. Superior Court, Cal.App., 9 Cal.Rptr. 14 (hearing granted by Supreme Court) and Adams v. Superior Court, 49 Cal.2d 427, 317 P.2d 983. It also filed a second memorandum, asserting that it is 'improper The court granted the motion, and its order uses the same language to describe the papers to be produced as the notice of motion, quoted above.

  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Superior Court

    191 Cal.App.2d 489 (Cal. Ct. App. 1961)   Cited 1 times

    We have reached the conclusion that petitioner is entitled to the writ prayed for. Respondent real party in interest relies upon McClatchy Newspapers v. Superior Court, 26 Cal.2d 386 [ 159 P.2d 944]; Adams v. Superior Court, 49 Cal.2d 427 [ 317 P.2d 983] and our decision in Steele v. Superior Court (Cal. App.) 9 Cal.Rptr. 14 (this opinion is no longer authority as hearing has been granted in Supreme Court). These cases are not applicable here.