From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steele v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 1, 1991
575 So. 2d 311 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-00613.

March 1, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Charlotte County, Elmer O. Friday, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Stephen Krosschell, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Brenda S. Taylor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We affirm the defendant's numerous convictions and sentences.

We disagree with the defendant's contention that his probationary split sentence of twelve years imprisonment followed by three years probation was improper. See Poore v. State, 531 So.2d 161 (Fla. 1988).

In case number 89-276, we strike the fine imposed pursuant to section 775.0835, Florida Statutes (1987), because there was no showing of the statutory requirement that the offenses involved resulted in the injury or death to the victim.

Affirmed, as modified by this opinion.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Steele v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 1, 1991
575 So. 2d 311 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Steele v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROGER EARL STEELE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 1, 1991

Citations

575 So. 2d 311 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Morran v. State

Because Morran's convictions did not involve injury or death, the trial court erred in imposing a fine under…