From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steele v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jul 3, 2012
91 So. 3d 269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 1D11–4865.

2012-07-3

Dennis L. STEELE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. Marci L. Goodman, Judge. Dennis L. Steele, pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jay Kubica, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. Marci L. Goodman, Judge.
Dennis L. Steele, pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jay Kubica, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

The appellant filed a rule 3.850 motion raising a facially sufficient sentencing issue, which the trial court denied because the appellant did not attach a copy of the plea and sentencing hearing transcript. However, the trial court has the responsibility to attach to the order denying the post-conviction motion the portion of the record conclusively refuting the appellant's claim. SeeFla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(d). The state has conceded that the case should be reversed and remanded for this purpose. We therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to either attach the portion of the record conclusively refuting the appellant's claim, or to hold an evidentiary hearing on it.

REVERSED AND REMANDED with directions.

THOMAS, WETHERELL, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Steele v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jul 3, 2012
91 So. 3d 269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Steele v. State

Case Details

Full title:Dennis L. STEELE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Jul 3, 2012

Citations

91 So. 3d 269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)