From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steele v. Pride Mobility Prods. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 28, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00903-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. Aug. 28, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00903-PAB-BNB

08-28-2012

JEAN STEELE, as the widow of Irvin J. Steele, and MICHAEL STEELE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Irvin J. Steele, Plaintiffs, v. PRIDE MOBILITY PRODUCTS CORPORATION, and VISCOUNT VEHICLE SHENZHEN CO., LTD., Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland


ORDER

This matter arises on the parties Stipulated Motion to Resolve Protective Order Disagreement [Doc. # 14, filed 8/27/2012] (the "Motion").

The procedure proposed by the plaintiffs for execution of a "written acknowledgment" provides adequate protection of confidential information and is the procedure normally utilized in connection with blanket protective orders entered in this district. Accordingly, the parties should include in their proposed blanket protective order the "Plaintiffs' proposed language" contained in Exhibit #1 to the Motion.

SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

Boyd N. Boland

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Steele v. Pride Mobility Prods. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 28, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00903-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. Aug. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Steele v. Pride Mobility Prods. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JEAN STEELE, as the widow of Irvin J. Steele, and MICHAEL STEELE, as…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 28, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00903-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. Aug. 28, 2012)