From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steele v. Leopold

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 7, 1911
94 N.E. 1099 (N.Y. 1911)

Opinion

Argued January 20, 1911

Decided February 7, 1911

C.R. Waterbury for plaintiff, appellant and respondent.

Edmond E. Wise for defendants, respondents and appellants.


On plaintiff's appeal the judgment of the Appellate Division is modified, so that instead of reducing the judgment in favor of the plaintiff a new trial is ordered, with costs to abide the event. If, however, within ten days plaintiff files in this court a stipulation waiving his appeal, then the judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, without costs in this court to either party; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, HAIGHT, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, CHASE and COLLIN, JJ.


Summaries of

Steele v. Leopold

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 7, 1911
94 N.E. 1099 (N.Y. 1911)
Case details for

Steele v. Leopold

Case Details

Full title:FRANKLIN STEELE, as Administrator with the Will Annexed of LOUISE GWYNNE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 7, 1911

Citations

94 N.E. 1099 (N.Y. 1911)
94 N.E. 1099

Citing Cases

Stark v. National City Bank of New York

In the absence of express or other sufficient authority there can be no question but that the employment by…

Rice v. Halsey

The referee, to whom the issues had been referred, held the defendants liable for that amount, together with…