From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steele v. Dep't of the Interior

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 12, 2015
589 F. App'x 988 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Opinion

2014-3064

01-12-2015

LAURA E. STEELE, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Respondent.

JOHN V. BERRY, Berry & Berry, PLLC, of Reston, Virginia, argued for petitioner. JANE W. VANNEMAN, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Assistant Attorney General, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, Director and FRANKLIN E. WHITE, Assistant Director; and KAREN D. GLASGOW, Department of the Interior, Office of the Solicitor, of San Francisco, California.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF-0752-12-0665-I-1.

JUDGMENT

JOHN V. BERRY, Berry & Berry, PLLC, of Reston, Virginia, argued for petitioner. JANE W. VANNEMAN, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Assistant Attorney General, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, Director and FRANKLIN E. WHITE, Assistant Director; and KAREN D. GLASGOW, Department of the Interior, Office of the Solicitor, of San Francisco, California. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 12, 2015

Date

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Steele v. Dep't of the Interior

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 12, 2015
589 F. App'x 988 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Steele v. Dep't of the Interior

Case Details

Full title:LAURA E. STEELE, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Respondent.

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 12, 2015

Citations

589 F. App'x 988 (Fed. Cir. 2015)