From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steele v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 29, 2012
Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-02335-AP (D. Colo. Nov. 29, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-02335-AP

11-29-2012

Charlotte Steele, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security Defendant.

For Plaintiff : Teresa Abbott For Defendant : John F. Walsh United States Attorney J. Benedict Garcia Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Alexess D. Rea Special Assistant United States Attorney


JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff:

Teresa Abbott

For Defendant:

John F. Walsh

United States Attorney

J. Benedict Garcia

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office

Alexess D. Rea

Special Assistant United States Attorney
2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: 08/31/12
B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 09/10/12
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 11/08/12

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

To the best of his knowledge, Plaintiff states that the record is complete and accurate. To the best of his knowledge, Defendant states that the record is complete and accurate.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

The parties state that this case does not raise unusual claims or defenses.

7. OTHER MATTERS

The parties state that there are no other matters.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: 1/11/13
B. Defendant's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 2/11/13
C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 2/26/13

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Indicate below the parties' consent choice.


A. () All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
B. (X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES. The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.

BY THE COURT:

John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED: Teresa Abbott
3515 S. Tamarac, Suite 200
Denver, CO 80237
303-757-5000
303-689-9627 (facsimile)
Abbott.teresa@gmail.com
Attorney for Plaintiff John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
By: __________
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
1001 17th Street
Denver, CO 80202
303-844-7101
303-844-0770 (facsimile)
Alexess.rea@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant


Summaries of

Steele v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 29, 2012
Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-02335-AP (D. Colo. Nov. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Steele v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Charlotte Steele, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Nov 29, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-02335-AP (D. Colo. Nov. 29, 2012)