From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steele v. All Ye Judges of Courts

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 11, 2022
1:22-cv-01117-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cv-01117-GSA-PC

10-11-2022

REBEKAH SUE STEELE, Plaintiff, v. ALL YE JUDGES OF THE COURTS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SUBMIT A NON-PRISONER APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON THE COURT'S FORM OR PAY THE $402.00 FILING FEE, WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

ORDER FOR CLERK TO SEND PLAINTIFF A NON-PRISONER APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FORM

GARY S. AUSTIN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Rebekah Sue Steele (“Plaintiff”) is a former jail inmate proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On September 15, 2022, the Court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to submit a nonprisoner application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $402.00 filing fee, within thirty days. (ECF No. 10.) The Court sent Plaintiff an application on the Court's form for Plaintiff to complete and return to the Court. (Id.) On September 28, 2022, Plaintiff filed a response to the Court's order, submitting a copy of a handwritten motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis for case no. 22HC00109.

Plaintiff's response to the Court's order is deficient. The motion submitted by Plaintiff is incomplete, does not pertain to this case, and was not submitted on the Court's form. Within thirty days, Plaintiff is required to submit a new application to proceed in forma pauperis by a non-prisoner on the Court's form or pay the $402.00 filing fee for this case.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk's Office shall send to Plaintiff a form for application to proceed in forma pauperis for a non-prisoner;

2. Within thirty days of the date of service of this order, Plaintiff is required to submit the completed and signed application to proceed in forma pauperis for a nonprisoner on the Court's form , or in the alternative, pay the $402.00 filing fee in full for this action; and

3. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation to dismiss this action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Steele v. All Ye Judges of Courts

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 11, 2022
1:22-cv-01117-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Steele v. All Ye Judges of Courts

Case Details

Full title:REBEKAH SUE STEELE, Plaintiff, v. ALL YE JUDGES OF THE COURTS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 11, 2022

Citations

1:22-cv-01117-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2022)