From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steel v. Sacramento County

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 25, 2008
No. CIV-S-07-2528 LKK EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV-S-07-2528 LKK EFB PS.

February 25, 2008


ORDER


On January 10, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed January 10, 2008, are ADOPTED; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice and the Clerk is directed to close this case. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); Local Rule 11-110.


Summaries of

Steel v. Sacramento County

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 25, 2008
No. CIV-S-07-2528 LKK EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2008)
Case details for

Steel v. Sacramento County

Case Details

Full title:DANIELLE MACY STEEL, Plaintiff, v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY, YOLO COUNTY…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 25, 2008

Citations

No. CIV-S-07-2528 LKK EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2008)