From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steel v. City of San Diego

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 18, 2012
466 F. App'x 620 (9th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 10-56079 D.C. No. 3:09-cv-01743-MMA- WVG No. 10-56193

01-18-2012

JOHN FREMONT STEEL, IV, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO; et al., Defendants - Appellees. JOHN FREMONT STEEL, IV, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO; et al., Defendants - Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Michael M. Anello, District Judge, Presiding


Argued and Submitted January 11, 2012

Pasadena, California

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, REINHARDT and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), a district court "may direct entry of a final judgment as to one or more, but fewer than all, claims or parties only if the court expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay." Because the district court did not make such a determination in the judgment before us, that judgment is not final. See Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981). We therefore dismiss these appeals for lack of jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Steel v. City of San Diego

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 18, 2012
466 F. App'x 620 (9th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Steel v. City of San Diego

Case Details

Full title:JOHN FREMONT STEEL, IV, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO; et…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 18, 2012

Citations

466 F. App'x 620 (9th Cir. 2012)