From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steed v. Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Fac.

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Jun 22, 2010
10-CV-2345 (RJD) (E.D.N.Y. Jun. 22, 2010)

Opinion

10-CV-2345 (RJD).

June 22, 2010


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


By order dated June 4, 2010, the Court directed petitioner Thomas Steed, appearing pro se, to show cause why this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed by letter dated April 28, 2010 should not be dismissed as time-barred pursuant to the one year statute of limitations under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 ("AEDPA"). In response, petitioner wrote to the Court seeking to have "this matter complete/dismissed as `time-barred'" (see docket entry #5). The Court liberally construes this letter as a voluntary dismissal of this petition as time-barred.

Accordingly, petitioner's request is GRANTED and this petition is dismissed as time-barred. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). As this petition presents no "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right," a certificate of appealability shall not issue. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis is denied for the purpose of any appeal.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Steed v. Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Fac.

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Jun 22, 2010
10-CV-2345 (RJD) (E.D.N.Y. Jun. 22, 2010)
Case details for

Steed v. Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Fac.

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS STEED, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT, UPSTATE CORRECTIONAL…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Jun 22, 2010

Citations

10-CV-2345 (RJD) (E.D.N.Y. Jun. 22, 2010)