Opinion
Argued October 28, 1939 —
Decided January 25, 1940.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 123 N.J.L. 158.
For the appellant, Firmin Michel.
For the respondents, Meyer L. Sakin.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, CASE, DONGES, HEHER, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.