Stearnsmiller v. Crosby

Full title: RICHARD STEARNSMILLER, Petitioner, v. JAMES V. CROSBY, et al., Respondent

Court: United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division

Date published: Feb 9, 2006

Case No. 4:05cv421-MMP/AK (N.D. Fla. Feb. 9, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 4:05cv421-MMP/AK.

February 9, 2006

ORDER

ALLAN KORNBLUM, Magistrate Judge

This matter is before the Court on document 18, a letter from the Petitioner with a print out of his inmate trust account information in support of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis, document 2. Ruling on Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, doc 2, was deferred on November 15, 2005, by order doc. 6, pending the filing of an amended motion to proceed in forma paupers and/or the inmate account information. The method of docketing document 18, is confusing, and when the Court undertakes consideration of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the supporting documentation (inmate trust account information), will result in further confusion. Thus, the Court will direct the Clerk as follows:

1. Docket the inmate trust account information separately in support of the Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, document 2.

2. The Clerk shall then take the appropriate steps to action require these two documents to the undersigned for disposition.

DONE AND ORDERED.