From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stearns v. Marvin

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1853
3 Cal. 376 (Cal. 1853)

Opinion


3 Cal. 376 J. G. STEARNS, Appellant, v. AZOR S. MARVIN, Executor, et al., Respondents Supreme Court of California October, 1853

         Appeal from the Superior Court of San Francisco.

         In the progress of this case, judgment was first entered against the defendants. A motion, founded upon an affidavit, was afterwards made to set aside the judgment and admit other parties, which the Court ordered, in accordance with the application, May 31, 1853. The new parties came in and answered June 1, 1853. And on the 8th August, a motion was made by plaintiff's counsel to dismiss the suit as to the parties introduced by the previous order, and for judgment against defendant; which motion was denied, and plaintiff appealed.

         JUDGES: Heydenfeldt, Justice, delivered the opinion of the Court. Murray, Chief Justice, concurred.

         OPINION

          HEYDENFELDT, Judge

         In this case no appeal lies from the refusal of the motion made by the plaintiff.

         If, as has been held, an appeal lies from an interlocutory order, it should have been taken upon the order setting aside the judgment.

         Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Stearns v. Marvin

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1853
3 Cal. 376 (Cal. 1853)
Case details for

Stearns v. Marvin

Case Details

Full title:J. G. STEARNS, Appellant, v. AZOR S. MARVIN, Executor, et al., Respondents

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 1, 1853

Citations

3 Cal. 376 (Cal. 1853)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Curtis

No appeal lies from such an order. (See Stearns v. Marvin , 3 Cal. 376; Henly v. Hastings , 3 Id. 341;…