From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stay Frosty Enters. v. Amazon.com, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Mar 31, 2021
No. 3:18-cv-00283-SB (D. Or. Mar. 31, 2021)

Opinion

No. 3:18-cv-00283-SB

03-31-2021

STAY FROSTY ENTERPRISES, LLC Plaintiff, v. AMAZON.COM, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Stacie Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation [122] on March 10, 2021, in which she recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff's motion for a default judgment against Defendant Milcoins.com, LLC ("Milcoins"). The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation [122]. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment [116] is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 31, 2021.

/s/_________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Stay Frosty Enters. v. Amazon.com, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Mar 31, 2021
No. 3:18-cv-00283-SB (D. Or. Mar. 31, 2021)
Case details for

Stay Frosty Enters. v. Amazon.com, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:STAY FROSTY ENTERPRISES, LLC Plaintiff, v. AMAZON.COM, INC., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Mar 31, 2021

Citations

No. 3:18-cv-00283-SB (D. Or. Mar. 31, 2021)