From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stawarz v. Rojas

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 6, 2007
Civil Action No. 07-165 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 6, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-165.

June 6, 2007


ORDER


AND NOW, this 6th day of June, 2007, after the Plaintiff, Walter Stawarz, IV, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint is dismissed before service, pursuant to the authority granted courts by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the plaintiff desires to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Stawarz v. Rojas

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 6, 2007
Civil Action No. 07-165 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 6, 2007)
Case details for

Stawarz v. Rojas

Case Details

Full title:WALTER STAWARZ, IV, Plaintiff v. RON ROJAS, Esquire; DIRK GOODWALD…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 6, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-165 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 6, 2007)

Citing Cases

Jones v. Robinson Twp. Police Dep't

Thus, under Heck, Jones' claims are not cognizable in this civil rights action unless and until his…

Jones v. Robinson Twp. Police Dep't

Thus, under Heck, Jones' claims are not cognizable in this civil rights action unless and until his…