Opinion
4:23-cv-00422-LPR
11-05-2024
JUSTIN SHANE STATON ADC #163883 PLAINTIFF v. JEREMY WILLIAMS, et al. DEFENDANTS
ORDER
LEE P. RUDOFSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition (RD) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin (Doc. 41) and the Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. 42). After a de novo review of the RD, along with careful consideration of the Objections and the entire case record, the Court hereby approves and adopts the RD in its entirety as this Court's findings and conclusions in all respects.
Accordingly, the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 32) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice based on his failure to fully exhaust his administrative remedies. Plaintiff's Motion to Stay (Doc. 43) is DENIED as moot. The Clerk is instructed to close this case. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order or the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED.