From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Staton v. Honorable

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Nov 9, 2012
No. 55 WM 2012 (Pa. Nov. 9, 2012)

Opinion

No. 55 WM 2012

11-09-2012

ANDRE STATON, Petitioner v. HONORABLE , Respondent


ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of November, 2012, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (hybrid representation not permitted). The Prothonotary is directed to forward the filings to counsel of record. Furthermore, the Prothonotary is directed to strike the jurist's name from the caption.


Summaries of

Staton v. Honorable

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Nov 9, 2012
No. 55 WM 2012 (Pa. Nov. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Staton v. Honorable

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE STATON, Petitioner v. HONORABLE , Respondent

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Nov 9, 2012

Citations

No. 55 WM 2012 (Pa. Nov. 9, 2012)