From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Staton v. Britton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 20, 2013
Civil Action No. 11 - 133J (W.D. Pa. Feb. 20, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11 - 133J

02-20-2013

MICHAEL STATON, Plaintiff, v. SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL BRITTON, et al., Defendants.


District Judge Kim R. Gibson

Chief Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan


MEMORANDUM ORDER

This case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by Chief Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on January 25, 2013. (ECF No. 45.) Judge Lenihan recommended that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Baker, Brumbaugh, Close, Hartnett, Kessling, and Smeal (ECF No. 40) be granted, the John Doe Defendants be dismissed and this case be closed. The parties were served with the Report and Recommendation and informed that they had until February 11, 2013, to file written objections. As of the date of this Order, however, no objections have been filed. As such, after de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered.

AND NOW, this 20th day of February, 2013,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Baker, Brumbaugh, Close, Hartnett, Kessling, and Smeal (ECF No. 40) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the remaining John Doe Defendants are DISMISSED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 45) dated January 25, 2013, is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court mark this case CLOSED.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

By the Court:

________

Kim R. Gibson

United States District Judge
cc: Michael Staton

GT-1279

SCI-Smithfield

P.O. Box 999

1120 Pike Street

Huntingdon, PA 16652

Via U.S. Postal Mail

Counsel of Record

Via ECF Electronic Mail


Summaries of

Staton v. Britton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 20, 2013
Civil Action No. 11 - 133J (W.D. Pa. Feb. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Staton v. Britton

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL STATON, Plaintiff, v. SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL BRITTON, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 20, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 11 - 133J (W.D. Pa. Feb. 20, 2013)