From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Statin v. Invum Two LLC

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Dec 16, 2014
NO. 01-14-00381-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 16, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 01-14-00381-CV

12-16-2014

KAREY BERNARD STATIN, Appellant v. INVUM TWO LLC, Appellee


On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No 2 Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 1042961

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Karey Bernard Statin, has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013), § 101.0411 (West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk's record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

On July 22, 2014, appellee filed a motion to dismiss this appeal on the basis that, among other things, appellant has not paid the required fees. Appellant did not file a response to the motion to dismiss. The motion to dismiss is granted.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Massengale, and Brown.


Summaries of

Statin v. Invum Two LLC

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Dec 16, 2014
NO. 01-14-00381-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 16, 2014)
Case details for

Statin v. Invum Two LLC

Case Details

Full title:KAREY BERNARD STATIN, Appellant v. INVUM TWO LLC, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Dec 16, 2014

Citations

NO. 01-14-00381-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 16, 2014)