From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stately v. Red Lake Builders

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Mar 1, 2011
794 N.W.2d 640 (Minn. 2011)

Opinion

No. A10-1909.

March 1, 2011.

Yuri Jelokov, Rodgers, Garbow Jelokov, P.L.L.C., Bemidji, MN, for relator.

Michael Forde, Andrew M. Grimsrud, Aafedt, Gray, Monson Hager, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondents.


ORDER


Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 30, 2010, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that "[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/David R. Stras

Associate Justice


Summaries of

Stately v. Red Lake Builders

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Mar 1, 2011
794 N.W.2d 640 (Minn. 2011)
Case details for

Stately v. Red Lake Builders

Case Details

Full title:Darwin STATELY, Relator, v. RED LAKE BUILDERS and GAB Robins North…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Mar 1, 2011

Citations

794 N.W.2d 640 (Minn. 2011)