Opinion
No. 2012AP2787.
2013-09-18
In re the COMMITMENT OF Michael S. ZIEGLER. State of Wisconsin, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Michael S. Ziegler, Respondent–Appellant.
The court then explained its decision to the jury in a note that read: Ziegler contends the court's rationale is wrong because, once admitted into evidence, the information in the reports in fact was presented to the jury and was part of the record. We reject this hypertechnical argument.