From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Zavala-Cano

COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION TWO DEPARTMENT B
May 11, 2012
2 CA-CR 2011-0109 (Ariz. Ct. App. May. 11, 2012)

Opinion

2 CA-CR 2011-0109

05-11-2012

THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. MARCOS AARON ZAVALA-CANO, Appellant.

Lori J. Lefferts, Pima County Public Defender By Rebecca A. McLean Tucson Attorneys for Appellant


NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c); ARCAP 28(c); Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Not for Publication Rule 111, Rules of the Supreme Court


APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PIMA COUNTY


Cause No. CR20100173006


Honorable Terry L. Chandler, Judge


AFFIRMED

Lori J. Lefferts, Pima County Public Defender

By Rebecca A. McLean

Tucson

Attorneys for Appellant
ESPINOSA, Judge.

¶1 After a jury trial, appellant Marcos Zavala-Cano was convicted of conspiracy to commit armed robbery and burglary, and later pled guilty to sale and/or transfer of a dangerous drug. The trial court sentenced him to mitigated, concurrent four-year terms of imprisonment. Counsel has filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Clark, 196 Ariz. 530, 2 P.3d 89 (App. 1999), stating she has reviewed the record and has found no "meritorious issues for appeal." Counsel has asked us to search the record for fundamental error. Zavala-Cano has not filed a supplemental brief.

¶2 Viewed in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdicts, the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's findings of guilt. See State v. Tamplin, 195 Ariz. 246, ¶ 2, 986 P.2d 914, 914 (App. 1999). The evidence presented at trial showed that Zavala-Cano and five others had made arrangements with undercover police officers posing as drug traffickers to commit a home invasion robbery. We further conclude the trial court correctly sentenced Zavala-Cano.

¶3 Pursuant to our obligation under Anders, we have searched the record for fundamental, reversible error and have found none. Zavala-Cano's convictions and sentences are affirmed.

_________________

PHILIP G. ESPINOSA, Judge

CONCURRING:

_________________

GARYE L. VÁSQUEZ, Presiding Judge

_________________

VIRGINIA C. KELLY, Judge


Summaries of

State v. Zavala-Cano

COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION TWO DEPARTMENT B
May 11, 2012
2 CA-CR 2011-0109 (Ariz. Ct. App. May. 11, 2012)
Case details for

State v. Zavala-Cano

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. MARCOS AARON ZAVALA-CANO, Appellant.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION TWO DEPARTMENT B

Date published: May 11, 2012

Citations

2 CA-CR 2011-0109 (Ariz. Ct. App. May. 11, 2012)